State ex rel. Newman v. Lowery

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Newman v. Lowery

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 1952·No. No. 32825·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question of parole of prisoners being in the discretion of the Pardon and Parole Commission, that commission had authority to rescind its order of March 9, 1950, granting a parole effective on or after a future date. The record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission in its order of rescission. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question of parole of prisoners being in the discretion of the Pardon and Parole Commission, that commission had authority to rescind its order of March 9, 1950, granting a parole effective on or after a future date. The record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission in its order of rescission. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Newman v. Lowery, 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463 (State ex rel. Newman v. Lowery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.