State ex rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 153, 83 Ohio St. 3d 134

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

Docket1996-2444

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 153 (State ex rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 153, 83 Ohio St. 3d 134 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 134.]

THE STATE EX REL. NEUMANN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-153.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and State ex rel. Gay relief ordered. (No. 96-2444—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD12-1648. __________________ Mitchell, Allen, Catalano & Boda Co., L.P.A., William A. Catalano and Richard A. Cline, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurel Blum Mazorow, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., dissents. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 134.]

THE STATE EX REL. NEUMANN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Neumann v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-153.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and State ex rel. Gay relief ordered. (No. 96-2444—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD12-1648. __________________ Mitchell, Allen, Catalano & Boda Co., L.P.A., William A. Catalano and Richard A. Cline, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurel Blum Mazorow, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., dissents. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 153, 83 Ohio St. 3d 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-neumann-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack