State ex rel. Nesselrode v. Piquette

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Nesselrode v. Piquette

261 So. 2d 545, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6883

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1972

DocketNo. 71-1238

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 So. 2d 545 (State ex rel. Nesselrode v. Piquette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Nesselrode v. Piquette, 261 So. 2d 545, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed a suggestion for writ of prohibition in the circuit court. The suggestion was dismissed and this appeal followed. Appellant urges that the circuit court failed to apply the correct rule of law as to when jeopardy attaches when a charge is dismissed in the Metropolitan Court. We hold that the court correctly applied the law set forth in Burnes v. State, 89 Fla. 494, 104 So. 783 (1925).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition filed a suggestion for writ of prohibition in the circuit court. The suggestion was dismissed and this appeal followed. Appellant urges that the circuit court failed to apply the correct rule of law as to when jeopardy attaches when a charge is dismissed in the Metropolitan Court. We hold that the court correctly applied the law set forth in Burnes v. State, 89 Fla. 494, 104 So. 783 (1925).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 So. 2d 545, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nesselrode-v-piquette-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack