State ex rel. Neslo v. State

927 So. 2d 297, 2006 La. LEXIS 1530, 2006 WL 1308744
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 1, 2006·No. No. 2006-KH-0065·Published

Opinion

In re Neslo, Reinier; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 276-264.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to quash and motion for new trial filed on September 23, 2002; a postconviction application filed April 20, 2004; and a supplemental memorandum filed September 27, 2004. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the pleadings. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleadings which are herewith transferred to the district court.' The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Neslo v. State, 927 So. 2d 297, 2006 La. LEXIS 1530, 2006 WL 1308744 (La. 2006).

927 So. 2d 297 (State ex rel. Neslo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.