State ex rel. Nelson v. Judge of the Sixth District Court

25 La. Ann. 227
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1873
DocketNo. 4624
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 25 La. Ann. 227 (State ex rel. Nelson v. Judge of the Sixth District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Nelson v. Judge of the Sixth District Court, 25 La. Ann. 227 (La. 1873).

Opinion

Ludeling, C. J.

The suit of the New Orleans and Bay Island Company v. Nelson & Poppleton is pending in the Sixth District Court. The defendant, after pleading to the merits, made a reconventional demand.

The Judge of the Sixth District Court refuses to fix this cause for trial unless the defendcmt shall give security for costs.

We know of no law or practice which would justify his conduct— nor lias he referred us to any.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judge a quo cause the clerk of his court to reinstate the said suit on the jury docket, and that the said case be called and fixed for trial according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herzog's Automotive Parts, Inc. v. Baronne Auto Supply, Inc.
639 So. 2d 1223 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
Wabnig v. Royal Crystal Art Co.
301 So. 2d 366 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
E. W. Montgomery Co. v. Gwin
58 F.2d 779 (N.D. Mississippi, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 La. Ann. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nelson-v-judge-of-the-sixth-district-court-la-1873.