State ex rel. Nelson v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Nelson v. Jones

619 N.E.2d 687, 67 Ohio St. 3d 438

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1993

DocketNo. 93-593

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 619 N.E.2d 687 (State ex rel. Nelson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Nelson v. Jones, 619 N.E.2d 687, 67 Ohio St. 3d 438 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

While we are aware of no procedural rule that authorizes the court to dismiss a case summarily on a question of law — see State ex rel. Hanson v. Guernsey Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 545, 605 N.E.2d 378 — we find on the merits that the court of appeals reached the right result and affirm its judgment based on Fenley, supra, and State ex rel. Nelson v. Fuerst (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 47, 607 N.E.2d 836.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

While we are aware of no procedural rule that authorizes the court to dismiss a case summarily on a question of law — see State ex rel. Hanson v. Guernsey Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 545, 605 N.E.2d 378 — we find on the merits that the court of appeals reached the right result and affirm its judgment based on Fenley, supra, and State ex rel. Nelson v. Fuerst (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 47, 607 N.E.2d 836.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 N.E.2d 687, 67 Ohio St. 3d 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nelson-v-jones-ohio-1993.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack