State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. James

307 N.W.2d 524, 209 Neb. 306, 1981 Neb. LEXIS 914
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 26, 1981
Docket44004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 307 N.W.2d 524 (State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. James, 307 N.W.2d 524, 209 Neb. 306, 1981 Neb. LEXIS 914 (Neb. 1981).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The respondent, Merritt E. James, has filed with this court a conditional admission of guilt of the formal *307 charges filed against him by the Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska State Bar Association.

Respondent is charged with a violation of Canon 6, DR 6-101(A)(3), and Canon 7, DR 7-101(A)(2), and with a violation of his license to practice law as provided in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 1977).

While representing a claimant in the Workmen’s Compensation Court, the respondent recovered an award which included the amount of $821.25 which had been paid by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska. Pursuant to agreement, the check for $821.25 was mailed to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska for endorsement with respondent’s check for $547.50, the amount of the recovery, less a one-third attorney fee. The check for $821.25 was endorsed and returned to respondent with a letter that his check would not be deposited for 1 week. Respondent’s check to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska was deposited and was returned marked insufficient funds. After discussion with the respondent, the amount of the check was sometime later paid over to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska.

The respondent, having failed to use a trust account for client’s funds and having failed to promptly transmit client’s funds to the client, is guilty of unprofessional conduct and is hereby publicly reprimanded for conduct violative of the Canons of Ethics and of his oath as a member of the bar of this court.

Judgment of reprimand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. James
673 N.W.2d 214 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 N.W.2d 524, 209 Neb. 306, 1981 Neb. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nebraska-state-bar-assn-v-james-neb-1981.