State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Hohenstein

500 N.W.2d 191, 243 Neb. 382, 1993 Neb. LEXIS 137
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 29, 1993·No. No. S-93-317·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A disciplinary complaint against respondent, Kurt A. Hohenstein, was filed with the Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska State Bar Association.

Respondent, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Nebraska, was retained to represent four individuals in regard to a motor vehicle accident. Respondent failed to deposit the proceeds from the settlement of this case in a proper client trust fund account, as required by Canon 9, DR 9-102(A), of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent admits that through mismanagement or otherwise, he allowed the accounts which contained the settlement proceeds to become overdrawn to the extent that the balance was less than the clients’ interest in the accounts.

Pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Discipline 15 (rev. 1992), respondent filed a voluntary surrender of license with this court. Respondent freely and voluntarily waives all proceedings against him in connection with the pending disciplinary complaint. Respondent knowingly admits that he has violated DR 9-102(A). He also freely and voluntarily consents to an order of disbarment and waives any right to notice, [383] appearance, or hearing prior to entry of the order.

Accordingly, respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Nebraska, effective immediately.

Judgment of disbarment.

White, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Hohenstein, 500 N.W.2d 191, 243 Neb. 382, 1993 Neb. LEXIS 137 (Neb. 1993).

500 N.W.2d 191 (State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Hohenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hohenstein v. Hohenstein
Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2023