State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Dolan

Nebraska Supreme Court

State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Dolan

581 N.W.2d 892, 255 Neb. 44, 1998 Neb. LEXIS 179

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 17, 1998

DocketNo. S-96-716

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 581 N.W.2d 892 (State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Dolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Dolan, 581 N.W.2d 892, 255 Neb. 44, 1998 Neb. LEXIS 179 (Neb. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, Gary L. Dolan, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Nebraska on June 27, 1972. Thereafter, he engaged in the private practice of law in Lancaster County.

[45]*45On June 13, 1996, respondent was found guilty by a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska of the felony offenses of bankruptcy fraud and conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 15 2, and 371 (1988), which are crimes involving moral turpitude. On July 2, this court entered an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law until final disposition of the disciplinary charges against him. The jury verdict against respondent was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on July 24, 1997.

On April 29, 1998, the Committee on Inquiry of the First Disciplinary District filed formal charges against respondent, alleging that his criminal conviction constituted a violation of his oath of office as an attorney and Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), and (5), of the Code of Professional Responsibility, as adopted by the Nebraska Supreme Court. DR 1-102 states in pertinent part: “(A) A lawyer shall not: (1) Violate a Disciplinary Rule. ... (3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.... (5) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” Respondent was served with a copy of the formal charges against him on May 27. Pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Discipline 10(H) (rev. 1996), “[t]he answer of the Respondent shall be filed within thirty days after service of summons and a copy of the Formal Charge ...” The time for respondent to answer has passed, and no answer has been filed.

Upon due consideration of the pleadings in this matter, this court finds that respondent should be disbarred and hereby orders him disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Nebraska, effective immediately. Respondent shall forthwith comply with Neb. Ct. R. of Discipline 16 (rev. 1996), and upon failure to do so, he shall be subject to punishment for contempt of this court.

Judgment of disbarment.

Wright and Stephan, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent, Gary L. Dolan, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Nebraska on June 27, 1972. Thereafter, he engaged in the private practice of law in Lancaster County.

[45]*45On June 13, 1996, respondent was found guilty by a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska of the felony offenses of bankruptcy fraud and conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 15 2, and 371 (1988), which are crimes involving moral turpitude. On July 2, this court entered an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law until final disposition of the disciplinary charges against him. The jury verdict against respondent was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on July 24, 1997.

On April 29, 1998, the Committee on Inquiry of the First Disciplinary District filed formal charges against respondent, alleging that his criminal conviction constituted a violation of his oath of office as an attorney and Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), and (5), of the Code of Professional Responsibility, as adopted by the Nebraska Supreme Court. DR 1-102 states in pertinent part: “(A) A lawyer shall not: (1) Violate a Disciplinary Rule. ... (3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.... (5) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” Respondent was served with a copy of the formal charges against him on May 27. Pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Discipline 10(H) (rev. 1996), “[t]he answer of the Respondent shall be filed within thirty days after service of summons and a copy of the Formal Charge ...” The time for respondent to answer has passed, and no answer has been filed.

Upon due consideration of the pleadings in this matter, this court finds that respondent should be disbarred and hereby orders him disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Nebraska, effective immediately. Respondent shall forthwith comply with Neb. Ct. R. of Discipline 16 (rev. 1996), and upon failure to do so, he shall be subject to punishment for contempt of this court.

Judgment of disbarment.

Wright and Stephan, JJ., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 N.W.2d 892, 255 Neb. 44, 1998 Neb. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nebraska-state-bar-assn-v-dolan-neb-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack