State ex rel. Nash v. State

147 So. 3d 1111, 2014 La. LEXIS 1949, 2014 WL 4799041
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 19, 2014
DocketNo. 2013-KH-2032
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 147 So. 3d 1111 (State ex rel. Nash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Nash v. State, 147 So. 3d 1111, 2014 La. LEXIS 1949, 2014 WL 4799041 (La. 2014).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

L Granted; relief denied; sentence corrected. The district court erred in granting relator’s motion to correct an illegal sentence by amending his sentence to reflect that it is no longer without parole eligibility and ordering the Louisiana Department of Corrections to revise relator’s prison master accordingly. The court further erred by directing the Department to calculate an eligibility date for parole consideration according to the criteria provided by La.R.S. 15:574.4(A)(2). Although relator seeks review because the district court did not provide him the remedy he sought — resentencing according to the applicable range for the next responsive verdict of manslaughter — the district court erred in granting relator any relief. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), is not retroactive to final sentences. State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, — U.S.—, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214 (2014). The district court’s order is therefore vacated in its entirety. Relator’s original sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence is reinstated. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 882 (an appellate court may correct an illegal sentence “at any time”); see also State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), 800 So.2d 790. The Department of Corrections is directed to maintain relator’s prison master in conformity with the terms of the sentence required by law.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nash
239 So. 3d 866 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State ex rel. Parfait v. State
158 So. 3d 825 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 So. 3d 1111, 2014 La. LEXIS 1949, 2014 WL 4799041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nash-v-state-la-2014.