State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm.

2001 Ohio 1310, 93 Ohio St. 3d 188

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 19, 2001

Docket2001-0194

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 1310 (State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm., 2001 Ohio 1310, 93 Ohio St. 3d 188 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 188.]

THE STATE EX REL. NASH, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., APPELLANT.

[Cite as State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1310.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-194—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1299. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ M. Blake Stone, L.P.A., and M. Blake Stone, for appellee. Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., and Susan E. Baker, for appellant. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 188.]

THE STATE EX REL. NASH, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., APPELLANT.

[Cite as State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1310.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-194—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1299. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ M. Blake Stone, L.P.A., and M. Blake Stone, for appellee. Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., and Susan E. Baker, for appellant. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1310, 93 Ohio St. 3d 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nash-v-indus-comm-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack