State ex rel. Nance v. McClelland

2012 Ohio 5083

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: October 26, 2012
• Docket: 98620
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Nance v. McClelland, 2012-Ohio-5083.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98620

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. KEVIN NANCE RELATOR

vs.

HONORABLE ROBERT C. MCCLELLAND RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 456974 Order No. 459387

RELEASE DATE: October 26, 2012 FOR RELATOR

Kevin Nance, pro se Inmate No. 521-533 Mansfield Correctional Institution P.O. Box 788 1150 North Main Street Mansfield, Ohio 44901

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

BY: James E. Moss Assistant Prosecuting Attorney The Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶1} Relator, Kevin Nance, is the defendant in State v. Nance, Cuyahoga C.P. No.

CR-482230, which is now assigned to respondent judge. The January 17, 2007

sentencing entry states, in part: “Defendant is to pay court costs.” Nance contends that

the trial court did not, however, impose court costs during his sentencing hearing and

appends what he considers to be the relevant portions of the sentencing transcript. He

requests that this court compel respondent to correct the sentencing entry to reflect that

Nance was found “guilty without stating court cost.” Complaint, ¶ 8.

{¶2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment and argues that relief in

mandamus is not appropriate. We agree.

{¶3} In Bandy v. Villanueva, 8th Dist. No. 98116, 2012-Ohio-3695, ¶ 2, we

recently observed:

It is well established that a defendant in a criminal proceeding may, at sentencing, request the trial court to waive costs. If the trial court denies the request to waive costs, the defendant has an adequate remedy by way of appeal. See, e.g., Henderson v. State, 8th Dist. No. 97042, 2011-Ohio-5679, citing Collins v. State, 8th Dist. No. 97111, 2011-Ohio-4964. “[A]ny error regarding the imposition of court costs can be challenged by appeal. State ex rel. Whittenberger v. Clarke (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 207, 208, 2000-Ohio-136, 729 N.E.2d 756.” State ex rel. Galloway v. Lucas Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 130 Ohio St.3d 206, 2011-Ohio-5259, 957 N.E.2d 11, ¶ 4. Obviously, Nance had an opportunity to request a waiver of costs at sentencing. If, in his

judgment, the trial court’s sentencing entry did not accurately reflect the proceedings

during his sentencing hearing, he could have assigned error on direct appeal.

{¶4} Nance had an adequate remedy by way of appeal. As a consequence, relief

in mandamus is inappropriate.

{¶5} Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Nance

to pay costs. This court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties notice of this

judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶6} Writ denied.

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR