Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Nakhle v. Court of Common Pleas

State ex rel. Nakhle v. Court of Common Pleas

386 N.E.2d 1117, 57 Ohio St. 2d 69, 11 Ohio Op. 3d 224, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 367
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 14, 1979
DocketNo. 78-790
StatusPublished

This text of 386 N.E.2d 1117 (State ex rel. Nakhle v. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Nakhle v. Court of Common Pleas, 386 N.E.2d 1117, 57 Ohio St. 2d 69, 11 Ohio Op. 3d 224, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 367 (Ohio 1979).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“Due to the extraordinary nature of the relief requested, the existence of an adequate legal remedy by the regular appellate process, and the fact that it has not been shown, at this point, that the respondent judge has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the cause which relator seeks to prohibit,” State, ex rel. Dayton Power & Light Co., v. Riley (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 168, the writ of prohibition is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in the judgment. Holmes, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Riley
373 N.E.2d 385 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 N.E.2d 1117, 57 Ohio St. 2d 69, 11 Ohio Op. 3d 224, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nakhle-v-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1979.