State ex rel. Nacarato v. Indus. Comm.

1999 Ohio 184, 86 Ohio St. 3d 590

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 590.]

THE STATE EX REL. NACARATO, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Nacarato v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-184.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2463—Submitted July 28, 1999—Decided September 22, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD08-977. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jon D. Grandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________