State ex rel. Myers v. Pyle

98 N.E.2d 369, 229 Ind. 323, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 159
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 1, 1951·No. No. 28,781·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a verified petition for an alternative writ of mandate to compel certain action by the respondent judge.

The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an in[324]*324ferior court, but wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35.

The issuance of the writ is denied.

NOTE.—Reported in 98 N. E. 2d 369.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Myers v. Pyle, 98 N.E.2d 369, 229 Ind. 323, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 159 (Ind. 1951).

98 N.E.2d 369 (State ex rel. Myers v. Pyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Scherer
98 N.E.2d 369 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)