State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections

936 N.E.2d 963, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1433
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 2010·No. 2010-1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the parties shall comply with the following schedule: respondents’ answer is due Thursday, November 18; relator’s brief and evidence are due Tuesday, November 23; respondents’ brief and evidence are due Monday, November 29; and relator’s reply brief is due Tuesday, November 30.

The parties shall serve all documents filed in this case by personal service, facsimile transmission, or e-mail on the date of the filing. The Clerk’s office shall refuse to file any requests for extension of time in this case.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections, 936 N.E.2d 963, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1433 (Ohio 2010).

936 N.E.2d 963 (State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Murray v. Scioto County Board of Elections
2010 Ohio 5846 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)