State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections
This text of 936 N.E.2d 963 (State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the parties shall comply with the following schedule: respondents’ answer is due Thursday, November 18; relator’s brief and evidence are due Tuesday, November 23; respondents’ brief and evidence are due Monday, November 29; and relator’s reply brief is due Tuesday, November 30.
The parties shall serve all documents filed in this case by personal service, facsimile transmission, or e-mail on the date of the filing. The Clerk’s office shall refuse to file any requests for extension of time in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
936 N.E.2d 963, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-murray-v-scioto-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2010.