State Ex Rel. Murray v. Reis

39 N.W.2d 396, 255 Wis. 507, 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 383
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 1949·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fairchild, J.

The affidavit of prejudice was clearly defective, Therefore, at the time of entering the order to suppress the adverse examination, the court, as then constituted with the Hon. Alvin C. Reis presiding, had jurisdiction to rule upon the matter. There was no valid and effective objection to the venue then laid.

With reference to the point attempted to be made that the judge disqualified himself by accepting petitioner’s objectionable affidavit, it appears that the jurisdiction to rule upon the *509 motion was not affected by anything then occurring. He said, “the court will accept Senator Murray’s statement that he cannot have a fair trial before me, but the court considers that the affidavit is not going to block me out from ruling on this preliminary question of law upon which my ruling cannot hurt the defendant whatsoever, even if it is against him, because it is a ruling on a question of law and I cannot, legally, be any more prejudiced on a question of law than can any judge in Wisconsin and, if I am wrong, the ruling is thoroughly reviewable before the supreme court of Wisconsin and its seven justices.”

By the Court. — Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Murray v. Reis, 39 N.W.2d 396, 255 Wis. 507, 1949 Wisc. LEXIS 383 (Wis. 1949).

39 N.W.2d 396 (State Ex Rel. Murray v. Reis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luedtke v. Luedtke
139 N.W.2d 553 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1966)