State ex rel. Murphy v. Bernier

38 N.W. 368, 98 Minn. 1, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 2
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 31, 1888·No. Nos. 5,406-(231)·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Now, after due consideration, it is ordered that said writ be, and hereby is, quashed and discharged, and that the respondents have judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Murphy v. Bernier, 38 N.W. 368, 98 Minn. 1, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 2 (Mich. 1888).

38 N.W. 368 (State ex rel. Murphy v. Bernier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hahn v. Graham
225 N.W.2d 385 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1975)
Kenner v. City National Bank
46 S.W.2d 46 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1932)
Weisgerber v. Nez Perce County
197 P. 562 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
Griffith v. County Court of Merger County
92 S.E. 676 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1917)
Backus v. City of Virginia
142 N.W. 1042 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Murphy v. City of Spokane
117 P. 476 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)
Elwell v. Comstock
109 N.W. 698 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)
People ex rel. Hartwick v. Avery
61 N.W. 4 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)