State ex rel. Muhammad v. Stewart

999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1437
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 2013
Docket2013-1529
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 693 (State ex rel. Muhammad v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Muhammad v. Stewart, 999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On respondents’ motions to dismiss. Motions granted. Relator’s motion for relief is denied. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-muhammad-v-stewart-ohio-2013.