State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co.

1998 Ohio 156, 83 Ohio St. 3d 132

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

Docket1996-2351

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 156 (State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co., 1998 Ohio 156, 83 Ohio St. 3d 132 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 132.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] MOYER, APPELLEE, v. KROGER COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co., 1998-Ohio-156.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2351—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD10-1312. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Karl J. Sutter and Charles J. Kurtz III, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 132.]

[THE STATE EX REL.] MOYER, APPELLEE, v. KROGER COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co., 1998-Ohio-156.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2351—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD10-1312. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Karl J. Sutter and Charles J. Kurtz III, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 156, 83 Ohio St. 3d 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-moyer-v-kroger-co-ohio-1998.