State ex rel. Mott v. Griffith
126 N.C. 775
This text of 126 N.C. 775 (State ex rel. Mott v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Mott v. Griffith, 126 N.C. 775 (N.C. 1900).
Opinion
From the facts agreed in this case it appears to us that the same questions of la<w are presented for our determination that were presented in the case of White v. Murray, at this term, and this case is controlled by the opinion in that case. The judgment of the court below that the plaintiff could not recover must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 N.C. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mott-v-griffith-nc-1900.