State Ex Rel. Moss v. Willis

185 So. 46
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State Ex Rel. Moss v. Willis. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 So. 221
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 12, 1938·No. No. 17103.·Published

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action. Appellants, stockholders in a private corporation, applied for a writ of quo war-ranto challenging the title to office of three of its directors. In State ex rel. Jones v. Carradine, 147 So. 554, it was held by this court that a writ of quo warranto will not issue to try title to office in a private corporation, its use being confined to public corporations. The writer of this opinion was the author of the opinion in the Car-radine Case, but that case has been over *47 ruled by a majority opinion of this Court in State ex rel. Palfrey v. Simms, 152 So. 395, consequently, the exception of no cause of action must be overruled.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is annulled, avoided and reversed and the exception of no cause of action overruled, and this cause remanded to the Civil District Court for further proceedings according to law and not inconsistent with the views herein expressed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Moss v. Willis, 185 So. 46 (La. Ct. App. 1938).

185 So. 46 (State Ex Rel. Moss v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Jones v. Carradine
147 So. 554 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)
State Ex Rel. Palfrey v. Simms
152 So. 395 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)