State ex rel. Morris v. Butler

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Morris v. Butler

546 So. 2d 185, 1989 La. LEXIS 1825, 1989 WL 81685

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 20, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-1600

StatusPublished

This text of 546 So. 2d 185 (State ex rel. Morris v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Morris v. Butler, 546 So. 2d 185, 1989 La. LEXIS 1825, 1989 WL 81685 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Morris, Carey N.; —Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 4-86-490, 4-86-120; 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 8-87-569.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief via certified mail. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Morris, Carey N.; —Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 4-86-490, 4-86-120; 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 8-87-569.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief via certified mail. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 So. 2d 185, 1989 La. LEXIS 1825, 1989 WL 81685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-morris-v-butler-la-1989.