State ex rel. Morrall v. Fickling

46 S.C.L. 9
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 46 S.C.L. 9 (State ex rel. Morrall v. Fickling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Morrall v. Fickling, 46 S.C.L. 9 (S.C. Ct. App. 1859).

Opinion

[12]*12The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’Neall, J.

This Court concurring in the ruling below, has directed me to announce the judgment of the Court.

To enable me to assign the reasons, I have read several times Judge Munro’s opinion, and it is so entirely satisfactory, that I find it to be impossible to assign other reasons.

We, therefore, express our entire concurrence in the opinion of Judge Munro.

The motion is dismissed.

Wardlaw, Withers, Whither and Glover, JJ., concurred.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.C.L. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-morrall-v-fickling-scctapp-1859.