State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State

3 So. 3d 456, 2009 La. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 566325
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 So. 3d 992
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 4, 2009·No. 2008-KH-1082·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is oi-dered to appoint counsel for relator and hold a hearing at which it will determine *457 the terms, if any, of the sentences negotiated by relator and the East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney. If the district court concludes that the parties negotiated an enforceable agreement that relator would spend no more than 10 years in prison, the court is ordered to resentence relator accordingly. See State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760, 763 (La.1983); State v. Hingle, 242 La. 844, 139 So.2d 205, 210 (1962). On the other hand, if the district court determines that relator pled guilty based on his attorney’s erroneous advice about eligibility for diminution of sentence for good behavior, the court must allow relator to withdraw his guilty pleas. See State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-1180 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602. Finally, if the court determines that relator pled guilty absent any misrepresentation concerning his eligibility for early release, it may deny relief in all respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State, 3 So. 3d 456, 2009 La. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 566325 (La. 2009).

3 So. 3d 456 (State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hingle
139 So. 2d 205 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1962)
State v. Tanner
425 So. 2d 760 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)
State Ex Rel. Aleman v. State
745 So. 2d 602 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)