State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State

3 So. 3d 456, 2009 La. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 566325

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 4, 2009

Docket2008-KH-1082

StatusPublished

This text of 3 So. 3d 456 (State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State, 3 So. 3d 456, 2009 La. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 566325 (La. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is oi-dered to appoint counsel for relator and hold a hearing at which it will determine *457 the terms, if any, of the sentences negotiated by relator and the East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney. If the district court concludes that the parties negotiated an enforceable agreement that relator would spend no more than 10 years in prison, the court is ordered to resentence relator accordingly. See State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760, 763 (La.1983); State v. Hingle, 242 La. 844, 139 So.2d 205, 210 (1962). On the other hand, if the district court determines that relator pled guilty based on his attorney’s erroneous advice about eligibility for diminution of sentence for good behavior, the court must allow relator to withdraw his guilty pleas. See State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-1180 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602. Finally, if the court determines that relator pled guilty absent any misrepresentation concerning his eligibility for early release, it may deny relief in all respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is oi-dered to appoint counsel for relator and hold a hearing at which it will determine *457 the terms, if any, of the sentences negotiated by relator and the East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney. If the district court concludes that the parties negotiated an enforceable agreement that relator would spend no more than 10 years in prison, the court is ordered to resentence relator accordingly. See State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760, 763 (La.1983); State v. Hingle, 242 La. 844, 139 So.2d 205, 210 (1962). On the other hand, if the district court determines that relator pled guilty based on his attorney’s erroneous advice about eligibility for diminution of sentence for good behavior, the court must allow relator to withdraw his guilty pleas. See State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-1180 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602. Finally, if the court determines that relator pled guilty absent any misrepresentation concerning his eligibility for early release, it may deny relief in all respects.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 So. 3d 456, 2009 La. LEXIS 40, 2009 WL 566325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-morgan-v-state-la-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack