State ex rel. Morgan v. Hard
This text of 25 Minn. 460 (State ex rel. Morgan v. Hard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alternative mandamus to compel the respondent, auditor of Fillmore county, to issue a warrant upon the county treasurer, for the amount certified by the judge of the district court to be due tha relator as court reporter, for transcribing the minutes of evidence in certain cases. It appears that upon the same certificate, and the same demand upon the auditor, proceedings by alternative mandamus were instituted by the relator against the respondent in the district court, and, after a full hearing, the alternative writ was dismissed, not for any technical defect in the writ, but upon a ground which, as the district court held, showed the relator not entitled to relief. That decision was on. the merits of the relator’s claim, and is a bar to this proceeding. If the decision of the district court was erroneous, and its dismissal of the proceedings based on insufficient grounds, the relator’s remedy was by appeal, and not by renewing the proceedings in another -court.
Alternative writ dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Minn. 460, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-morgan-v-hard-minn-1879.