State ex rel. Moody v. Cronin

31 P. 864, 5 Wash. 398, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 80
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 1892·No. No. 686·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The single question involved in this case is, whether a vacancy in the office of justice of the peace can be filled by appointment of the board of county commissioners. General Statutes, § 308, et seq., provide for the filling of such a vacancy by an election, and the court below held that they were the law of the case. But in our judgment they have been superseded by the provision made in sec. 6, art. 11 of the constitution. That section provides that all vacancies in county, township, precinct and road district officers shall be filled by appointment of the commissioners. The constitutional provision is certainly [399]*399self-executing and must prevail, if a justice of the peace is a county or precinct officer. In our judgment, although he is a judicial officer, he is at the same time a precinct officer, and therefore the statute has been superseded, and the appointment of the commissioners was valid.

This renders it necessary to reverse the judgment, and it is so ordered.

Anders, C. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Moody v. Cronin, 31 P. 864, 5 Wash. 398, 1892 Wash. LEXIS 80 (Wash. 1892).

31 P. 864 (State ex rel. Moody v. Cronin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Munro
327 P.2d 729 (Washington Supreme Court, 1958)
Hemmi v. James
2 P.2d 750 (Washington Supreme Court, 1931)