State Ex Rel. Moffitt v. Zupnik

51 N.E.2d 661, 142 Ohio St. 232, 142 Ohio St. (N.S.) 232, 27 Ohio Op. 183, 1943 Ohio LEXIS 354

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 17, 1943·No. 29558·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The legal questions presented by appellants cannot be decided upon the pleadings alone or from the record which is before us.

There being no bill of exceptions in the record, the motion of appellee is sustained and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell. Williams and Turner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The legal questions presented by appellants cannot be decided upon the pleadings alone or from the record which is before us.

There being no bill of exceptions in the record, the motion of appellee is sustained and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell. Williams and Turner, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Moffitt v. Zupnik, 51 N.E.2d 661, 142 Ohio St. 232, 142 Ohio St. (N.S.) 232, 27 Ohio Op. 183, 1943 Ohio LEXIS 354 (Ohio 1943).

Pincite

51 N.E.2d 661 (State Ex Rel. Moffitt v. Zupnik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.