State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Exceptions of Richey

249 S.W.3d 922, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 512
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 2008·No. ED 89446·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Shawn Richey, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County entered following a jury verdict awarding Richey $25,680 for condemnation of his property by the plaintiff, the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission (“the Commission”). On appeal, Richey claims that the trial court erred in allowing the Commission to introduce evidence that the driveway it constructed on the condemned property — and which provides access to Richey’s remaining property — possibly could be widened in the future to allow more diverse uses of Richey’s remaining property. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Exceptions of Richey, 249 S.W.3d 922, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 512 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

249 S.W.3d 922 (State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Exceptions of Richey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cozart v. Board of Education
249 S.W.3d 922 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)