State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Exceptions of Richey
This text of 249 S.W.3d 922 (State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Exceptions of Richey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The defendant, Shawn Richey, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County entered following a jury verdict awarding Richey $25,680 for condemnation of his property by the plaintiff, the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission (“the Commission”). On appeal, Richey claims that the trial court erred in allowing the Commission to introduce evidence that the driveway it constructed on the condemned property — and which provides access to Richey’s remaining property — possibly could be widened in the future to allow more diverse uses of Richey’s remaining property. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 S.W.3d 922, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-missouri-highway-transportation-commission-v-exceptions-of-moctapp-2008.