State Ex Rel. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway v. District Court
This text of 235 N.W. 629 (State Ex Rel. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator resorts to mandamus for the purpose of reviewing an order of the court below in refusing to change the venue on the ground of convenience of witnesses and that such removal will promote the ends of justice. The record jiresented to us discloses the presence of an issue of fact. The court might have decided either way. There was no abuse of discretion. Under such circumstance the decision of the lower court is final. Coates v. Holden, 181 Minn. 517, 233 N. W. 9.
The order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue as prayed for in the petition is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 N.W. 629, 183 Minn. 100, 1931 Minn. LEXIS 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-minneapolis-northfield-southern-railway-v-district-court-minn-1931.