State ex rel. Milton v. Milton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

State ex rel. Milton v. Milton

598 So. 2d 916, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 125, 1992 WL 45638

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Milton v. Milton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 468 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 13, 1992·No. 2900404·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. 598 So.2d 914. On remand and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of February [917]*91714, 1992, we now issue the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to withdraw its order for the blood tests.

WRIT GRANTED.

THIGPEN and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. 598 So.2d 914. On remand and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of February [917]*91714, 1992, we now issue the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to withdraw its order for the blood tests.

WRIT GRANTED.

THIGPEN and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Milton v. Milton, 598 So. 2d 916, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 125, 1992 WL 45638 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

598 So. 2d 916 (State ex rel. Milton v. Milton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related