State ex rel. Millerke v. Nisbet
This text of 161 N.W. 351 (State ex rel. Millerke v. Nisbet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The city of Dell Rap-ids is a city under the commission form- of government. On January 31, 1916, a petition was filed by 170 electors of tire city (nearly one-half of the total number voting at th-e last preceding municipal election) with the city auditor, asking that there be submitted to the electors of the city the question whether the city should- -change its form of government and become incorporated under -charter 14 of the Revised Political ’Code, -commonly -referred to as the aldermanic form of government. The municipal officers failed to- comply with the petition, an-dl -in Ma-rdh, 191Ó, relator applied for, -and secured, an -alternative writ of mandamus requiring -such officers to act or to show cause why they 'had not -done -so. Upon the trial judgment was entered directing the issuance of a peremptory writ. Therefrom the -defendant's -appealed -to this court.
By the provisions of chapter 125, Laws 1913, section 1x70 of chapter 14 of th-e Revised Political Code was- amended to read as follows-; the new portion being italicized1 by us:
“Any -city now existing in -this state under a special charter, Or incorporated as a city under commission, rnlay become -incorporated under th-is article in the manner following: Whenever one-eighth of the legal voters of s'uch -city voting at the last preceding -municipal election shall petition- the mayor and -council thereof to -submit the question as to whether su-ch city shall [349]*349become incorporated under this article to a vote of' the electors of ®uch oity, it shall he the duty of s'uch mayor and council to submit such 'question accordingly, zvitlnn thirty (30) days after the filing of suck petition, and to appoint a time and place or places at which such vote may be taken, and to designate the persons who shall act as judges at such election; but such question shall not be submitted oftener than once in each- year.”
“An act to amend' section 1170 of the Revised' Political Code of 1903 of the state of South Dakota, relating to organization of cities.”
[350]*350The subject of the act is single. It is the method by 'which cities not organized under chapter 14, Rev. Bol. 'Code, may take the first step to become so organized. Likewise, not more than one subject was expressed in the title. The title 'would have been ample if it had simply said, “An act to amend section 1170,. Revised Political 'Cod'e of 1903.” Wilson v. Western Surety Co., 31 S. D. 175, 140 N. W. 263; State ex rel. Olson v. Erickson, 125 Minn. 238, 146 N. W. 364.
No error appearing, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 N.W. 351, 38 S.D. 347, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-millerke-v-nisbet-sd-1917.