State ex rel. Miller v. Saffold
This text of 2026 Ohio 358 (State ex rel. Miller v. Saffold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Miller v. Saffold, 2026-Ohio-358.]
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
STATE EX REL. GREGORY MILLER, JR., :
Relator, : No. 115886
v. :
HON. JEFFREY P. SAFFOLD, :
Respondent. :
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED DATE: February 4, 2026
Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 591134 Order No. 591941
Appearances:
Gregory Miller, Jr., pro se.
Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael J. Stewart, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.:
On December 5, 2025, the relator, Gregory Miller, Jr., commenced
this procedendo action to compel the respondent, Judge Jeffrey Saffold, to proceed to judgment on a postconviction-relief petition that Miller filed on June 27, 2025, in
the underlying case, State v. Miller, Cuyahoga No. CR-21-664866-A. On January 5,
2026, the respondent judge moved to dismiss the procedendo action on the grounds
of mootness. Attached to the dispositive motion was a copy of a certified December
23, 2025 journal entry denying Miller’s postconviction-relief petition. This journal
entry establishes that the judge has proceeded to judgment and that Miller has
received his requested relief, a ruling on his petition, and that this procedendo action
is moot. Miller did not file a response to the motion to dismiss but did appeal the
denial of the postconviction-relief petition, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 116061.
Accordingly, this court grants the respondent’s motion to dismiss and
dismisses the writ. Costs assessed against respondent; costs waived. The clerk is
directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon
the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Complaint dismissed.
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, P.J., and WILLIAM A. KLATT, J.,* CONCUR
(*Sitting by assignment: William A. Klatt, J., retired, of the Tenth District Court of Appeals.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2026 Ohio 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-miller-v-saffold-ohioctapp-2026.