State ex rel. Miller v. Bond

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Miller v. Bond

534 So. 2d 960, 1988 La. LEXIS 2770, 1988 WL 138669

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 16, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-2915

StatusPublished

This text of 534 So. 2d 960 (State ex rel. Miller v. Bond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Miller v. Bond, 534 So. 2d 960, 1988 La. LEXIS 2770, 1988 WL 138669 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Miller, Ralph Tommy; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-1248; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 3482-78, 12290-82.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for a writ of habeas corpus. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Miller, Ralph Tommy; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-1248; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 3482-78, 12290-82.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for a writ of habeas corpus. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 So. 2d 960, 1988 La. LEXIS 2770, 1988 WL 138669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-miller-v-bond-la-1988.