State ex rel. Miles v. State

855 So. 2d 732, 2003 La. LEXIS 2242, 2003 WL 22061116
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 5, 2003·No. No. 2002-KH-1843·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator and to hold a hearing at which it will determine whether misinformation with regard to relator’s eligibility for diminution of sentence pursuant to La.R.S. 15:571.3 (“good time”) constituted a material inducement for his guilty plea to armed robbery which precluded relator from entering a knowing and voluntary guilty plea “with eyes open,” Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 242, 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942), and entitles him to withdraw that plea. See State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-0488 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Miles v. State, 855 So. 2d 732, 2003 La. LEXIS 2242, 2003 WL 22061116 (La. 2003).

855 So. 2d 732 (State ex rel. Miles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Martin
120 So. 3d 721 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Russell Martin
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012
State v. Solomon
90 So. 3d 1040 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2012)