State Ex Rel. Midland Bank v. Village of Northfield

10 N.E.2d 783, 133 Ohio St. 17, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 17, 9 Ohio Op. 372, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 187
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 28, 1937
Docket26112
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 N.E.2d 783 (State Ex Rel. Midland Bank v. Village of Northfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Midland Bank v. Village of Northfield, 10 N.E.2d 783, 133 Ohio St. 17, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 17, 9 Ohio Op. 372, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 187 (Ohio 1937).

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the relator, The Midland Bank, and the answers of the respondents, Village of Northfield, Village of Saga-more Hills and Northfield Center Township and of the respondent officials of said villages and township, respectively, and upon the agreed statement of facts approved on behalf of said relator and of such respon *18 dents, whereupon it is found that the following facts in said petition are true, to wit:

That the relator is the owner and holder of the notes' set forth in the relator’s petition and that said notes were duly and legally authorized and issued by respondent Tillage of Northfield, pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and general laws of the state of Ohio under a then existing 15-mill tax limitation; that the form of the notes is properly described in said petition; that the ordinance authorizing* said notes provided for the issuance of bonds of said village in anticipation of the collection of special assessments and pledged the full faith, credit and revenue of said village for the purpose of paying off said notes; that respondents Tillage of Sagamore Hills and Northfield Center Township constituted at the time said notes were issued a part of the respondent Tillage of North-field and are liable upon the indebtedness of respondent Tillage of Northfield outstanding prior to October 21, 1930, in proportion to their respective tax duplicates after detachment, to wit: respondent Tillage of Northfield, 7.9423%; respondent Tillage of Sagamore Hills, 57.5097%; and respondent Northfield Center Township, 34.998%; that the entire principal amount of said notes, together with interest accrued thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from February 8, 1934, are due and unpaid and that no bonds have been issued nor, prior to the fiscal year 1937, any general taxes' levied by said respondents for the purpose of paying off said notes or the interest accrued thereon.

It is therefore hereby ordered and adjudged that a peremptory writ of mandamus shall issue as follows:

A.

Commanding respondents Tillage of Northfield and Tillage of Sagamore Hills and their respective mayors', clerks and members of council, and respondent North-field Center Township, and the trustees and clerk of *19 said township, to apply all funds representing collections of special assessments which are now in the hands' of the clerk of said Village of Sagamore Hills or the clerk of said Village of. Northfield or which are due said respondent subdivisions and are in the hands of the Auditor of Summit county, first in payment of all interest accrued upon the note indebtedness' of said Village of Northfield outstanding in the hands of the relator or other private holders, and then in payment pro rata on account of the principal amount due and unpaid on any such notes.

Commanding the respondents to do and perform either those acts specified in part B of this order, or in the alternative those acts specified in part C of this order, to wit:

B.

The respondent Village of Northfield and respondent officials thereof shall make such application to the Bureau of Inspection and Supervision of Public Offices of the state of Ohio pursuant to the provisions of Section 2293-29, G-eneral Code, for authority to issue bonds pursuant to the Uniform Bond Act in a face amount greater than the unmatured assessments levied to pay the cost of the improvements financed by notes issued in anticipation of such bonds and maturing over a period not exceeding ten years, as will enable said respondent subdivision to comply with the further orders herein contained; and respondent Village of Sagamore Hills and respondent Northfield Center Township, and their respective officials shall cooperate in every way necessary to procure said consent, including the furnishing of such information, certificates and other documents as said bureau of inspection may require.

The council of respondent Village of Northfield and the mayor of said village, subject to the issuance of the certificate of the Bureau of Inspection and Supervision of Public Offices pursuant to Section 2293-29, *20 General Code, shall adopt and approve legislation authorizing the issuance of a bond issue or issues in aggregate face amount equal to the face amount of the entire note indebtedness of said village then outstanding and unpaid or uncancelled, or in such lesser aggregate amount as shall equal the face amount of all outstanding note issues of said village the holders of which shall have consented to an exchange under the provisions of Section 2293-29(a), General Code, for bonds bearing the provisions herein specified, to wit, said bonds to be dated March 1, 1937, to mature over a period not exceeding ten years and pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Bond Act, to bear interest at the rate of 4% per annum, payable semi-annually, to recite on their face that they are issued pursuant to this order, and to be supported by pledge of all special assessments thereafter collected and applicable to the notes issued in anticipation of said bond issue or issues and by a general tax levied for the life of said bonds in an amount sufficient to pay said village’s proportion, to wit 7.9423%, of the debt service charges thereon and levied irrespective of the 10-mill limitation and subject only to the 15-mill limitation applicable at the time of issuance of the aforesaid notes.

The council of the respondent Village of Sagamore Hills and the mayor of said village and the board of trustees of respondent Northfield Center Township shall adopt legislation approving the bond issue or issues authorized by the aforesaid legislation of the Village of Northfield, assuming their respective proportions of the indebtedness evidenced by said bonds, namely, 57.5097% on the part of the Village of Saga-more Hills, and 34.998% on the part of Northfield Center Township; and each levy for the life of said bonds' a tax sufficient to pay their aforesaid respective proportions of the debt service charges on said bonds irrespective of the 10-mill limitation and subject only to the aforesaid 15-mill limitation, and also pledging *21 to the payment of said bonds and the interest accruing thereon all collections of special assessments collected by or for the account of said respective subdivisions and applicable to the payment of the notes issued in anticipation of said bonds.

The respondent officials of the Village of Northfield and Northfield Center Township shall apply upon the first maturing installments of interest and principal of the aforesaid bonds such amounts as are necessary to pay the proportionate share of each of such subdivisions out of the money collected from the debt levy of 2.40 mills and 3.30 mills respectively, as contained in the budget for each of such subdivisions for the fis'cal year 1937, and the council of the Village of Sagamore Hills shall appropriate out of the village’s general operating levy contained in its budget for the fiscal year 1937, for application upon the first maturing installments of interest' and principal of the aforesaid bonds an amount equivalent to a levy of 2.40 mills.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
28 N.E.2d 599 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.E.2d 783, 133 Ohio St. 17, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 17, 9 Ohio Op. 372, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-midland-bank-v-village-of-northfield-ohio-1937.