State ex rel. Micieses v. Recorder Benit
This text of 15 La. Ann. 406 (State ex rel. Micieses v. Recorder Benit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relator prays for a mandamus to compel the allowance of an appeal from a conviction in the Recorder’s Court, for selling liquor to a slave without the consent of his owner. Fine of $500 imposed.
The answer of the Recorder denies the right to appeal in this case, because there was no question of law presented by the record, and the petition for mandamus does not state any such, as required by Article 840 of the Code of Practice. Respondent also quotes Art. 62 of the Constitution, defining the appellate jurisdiction of this court in criminal cases, and confining it to questions of law alone.
The relator is clearly entitled to the appeal prayed for; a fine having been imposed upon him of more than three hundred dollars.
Let a peremptory mandamus issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. Ann. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-micieses-v-recorder-benit-la-1860.