State Ex Rel. Miami Conservancy Dist. v. Baden

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Miami Conservancy Dist. v. Baden

196 N.E. 382, 129 Ohio St. 588, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588, 3 Ohio Op. 42, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 307

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 1935

Docket25322

StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.E. 382 (State Ex Rel. Miami Conservancy Dist. v. Baden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Miami Conservancy Dist. v. Baden, 196 N.E. 382, 129 Ohio St. 588, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588, 3 Ohio Op. 42, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 307 (Ohio 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals of Butler county and upon the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error filed as of right herein, the action having originated in the Court of Appeals, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the motion be, and the same hereby is, sustained and the petition in error dismissed, for the reason that the record discloses no final judgment or order of the Court of Appeals at the time this proceeding in error was prosecuted to this court.

Petition in error dismissed.

Wbygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals of Butler county and upon the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error filed as of right herein, the action having originated in the Court of Appeals, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the motion be, and the same hereby is, sustained and the petition in error dismissed, for the reason that the record discloses no final judgment or order of the Court of Appeals at the time this proceeding in error was prosecuted to this court.

Petition in error dismissed.

Wbygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 N.E. 382, 129 Ohio St. 588, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588, 3 Ohio Op. 42, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-miami-conservancy-dist-v-baden-ohio-1935.