State ex rel. Messier v. Turrow
This text of 99 A.2d 484 (State ex rel. Messier v. Turrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This petition for mandamus is brought against the respondents, as they constitute the board of canvassers of the city of Central Falls, and raises the same constitutional question as that which was involved in the case of State ex rel. Flynn v. McCaughey, 81 R. I. 143.
By agreement the petitioners and respondents submitted the instant case on their separate briefs which repeat the arguments presented in the above-cited case. The opinion in that case has been filed October 2,1953 and is made a part hereof by reference.
For the same reasons set forth therein the instant petition is denied and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 A.2d 484, 81 R.I. 149, 1953 R.I. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-messier-v-turrow-ri-1953.