State ex rel. Messier v. Turrow

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State ex rel. Messier v. Turrow

99 A.2d 484, 81 R.I. 149, 1953 R.I. LEXIS 27

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 2, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This petition for mandamus is brought against the respondents, as they constitute the board of canvassers of the city of Central Falls, and raises the same constitutional question as that which was involved in the case of State ex rel. Flynn v. McCaughey, 81 R. I. 143.

By agreement the petitioners and respondents submitted the instant case on their separate briefs which repeat the arguments presented in the above-cited case. The opinion in that case has been filed October 2,1953 and is made a part hereof by reference.

For the same reasons set forth therein the instant petition is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This petition for mandamus is brought against the respondents, as they constitute the board of canvassers of the city of Central Falls, and raises the same constitutional question as that which was involved in the case of State ex rel. Flynn v. McCaughey, 81 R. I. 143.

By agreement the petitioners and respondents submitted the instant case on their separate briefs which repeat the arguments presented in the above-cited case. The opinion in that case has been filed October 2,1953 and is made a part hereof by reference.

For the same reasons set forth therein the instant petition is denied and dismissed.

State ex rel. Messier v. Turrow, 99 A.2d 484, 81 R.I. 149, 1953 R.I. LEXIS 27 (R.I. 1953).

Pincite

99 A.2d 484 (State ex rel. Messier v. Turrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related