State Ex Rel. Messenger v. Industrial Commission
This text of 23 N.E.2d 949 (State Ex Rel. Messenger v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court finds, by consent of counsel, that at the time of the filing of the petition herein the relator was entitled to the relief prayed for; that since the filing of the petition a final order was made and entered in claim Nó. 6295-27 by said respondent and for that reason no final order is required.
It is therefore by consent of counsel the order of this court that the prayer of the relator for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to make and enter a final order in said claim No. 6295-27 be denied and the petition be dismissed at the cost.of the respondent, the Industrial Commission of Ohio.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 N.E.2d 949, 136 Ohio St. 122, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122, 16 Ohio Op. 45, 1939 Ohio LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-messenger-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1939.