State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources

939 N.E.2d 864, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1495

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 2011

Docket2009-1806

StatusPublished

This text of 939 N.E.2d 864 (State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 939 N.E.2d 864, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2008-L-007 and 2008-L-008, 2009-Ohio-4256. This cause is pending before this court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lake County.

Upon consideration of the motion to determine an order and allocate separate additional time for oral argument of Homer S. Taft, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted in part, and oral argument scheduled for Tuesday, February 1, 2011, shall proceed as follows: Appellants/crossappellees’ ease-in-ehief; appellee/eross-appellant’s case-in-chief; appellees/cross-appellees’ argument in response to the appeal and cross-appeal; appellants/cross-appellees’ rebuttal, if any; appellee/crossappellant’s rebuttal, if any.

It is further ordered that appellants/cross-appellees shall have fifteen minutes of argument time, appellee/cross-appellant shall have ten minutes of argument time, and appellees/cross-appellees shall have ten minutes of argument time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 2008-L-007 and 2008-L-008, 2009-Ohio-4256. This cause is pending before this court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lake County.

Upon consideration of the motion to determine an order and allocate separate additional time for oral argument of Homer S. Taft, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted in part, and oral argument scheduled for Tuesday, February 1, 2011, shall proceed as follows: Appellants/crossappellees’ ease-in-ehief; appellee/eross-appellant’s case-in-chief; appellees/cross-appellees’ argument in response to the appeal and cross-appeal; appellants/cross-appellees’ rebuttal, if any; appellee/crossappellant’s rebuttal, if any.

It is further ordered that appellants/cross-appellees shall have fifteen minutes of argument time, appellee/cross-appellant shall have ten minutes of argument time, and appellees/cross-appellees shall have ten minutes of argument time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

939 N.E.2d 864, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-merrill-v-ohio-dept-of-natural-resources-ohio-2011.