State ex rel. Meek v. Criminal Court

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Meek v. Criminal Court

155 N.E.2d 852, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 221

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided February 5, 1959·No. No. 0-543·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner has filed what he calls a verified petition for writ of mandate to compel the Judge of “The Criminal Court of Washington County, Salem, Indiana,” to act upon an alleged petition for writ of error coram nobis. The petition filed herein fails to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court in that there are no certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries of the lower court upon which the petition is based.

Since the petition must be dismissed for the reason above given, it is not necessary to consider that there is no such court as the “Criminal Court of Washington County.”

The petition, therefore, is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 155 N. E. 2d 852.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

The petitioner has filed what he calls a verified petition for writ of mandate to compel the Judge of “The Criminal Court of Washington County, Salem, Indiana,” to act upon an alleged petition for writ of error coram nobis. The petition filed herein fails to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court in that there are no certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries of the lower court upon which the petition is based.

Since the petition must be dismissed for the reason above given, it is not necessary to consider that there is no such court as the “Criminal Court of Washington County.”

The petition, therefore, is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 155 N. E. 2d 852.

State ex rel. Meek v. Criminal Court, 155 N.E.2d 852, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 221 (Ind. 1959).

Pincite

155 N.E.2d 852 (State ex rel. Meek v. Criminal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.