State ex rel. Medford v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Medford v. State

747 So. 2d 1112, 1999 La. LEXIS 2923, 1999 WL 780994

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 24, 1999

DocketNo. 99-KH-1166

StatusPublished

This text of 747 So. 2d 1112 (State ex rel. Medford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Medford v. State, 747 So. 2d 1112, 1999 La. LEXIS 2923, 1999 WL 780994 (La. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

IN RE: Medford, Thomas; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 84-2705; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 99-KH-377

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. If it has not done so already, the district court is ordered to issue a ruling on relator’s claims based on newly discovered evidence, first raised in relator’s application for post-conviction relief filed in April, 1994, see State ex rel. Medford v. Whitley, 95-2974 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 652, but not treated in the district court’s order of March 1, 1999. In all other respects, the application is denied.

[1113]*1113TRAYLOR, J., not on panel. KNOLL, J., would deny;the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN RE: Medford, Thomas; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 84-2705; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 99-KH-377

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. If it has not done so already, the district court is ordered to issue a ruling on relator’s claims based on newly discovered evidence, first raised in relator’s application for post-conviction relief filed in April, 1994, see State ex rel. Medford v. Whitley, 95-2974 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 652, but not treated in the district court’s order of March 1, 1999. In all other respects, the application is denied.

[1113]*1113TRAYLOR, J., not on panel. KNOLL, J., would deny;the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

747 So. 2d 1112, 1999 La. LEXIS 2923, 1999 WL 780994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-medford-v-state-la-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack