State Ex Rel. Mead v. State

891 So. 2d 680, 2005 WL 170220
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 7, 2005
Docket2004-KH-0030
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 891 So. 2d 680 (State Ex Rel. Mead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Mead v. State, 891 So. 2d 680, 2005 WL 170220 (La. 2005).

Opinion

891 So.2d 680 (2005)

STATE ex rel. Sylvester MEAD
v.
STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2004-KH-0030.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 7, 2005.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a hearing at which it will determine whether relator is entitled to an out-of-time appeal of his resentence under the rule of State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336, 340 (La.1985) (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either "the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defendant attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.") In all other respects the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mead
988 So. 2d 740 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 So. 2d 680, 2005 WL 170220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mead-v-state-la-2005.