State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold
This text of 2013 Ohio 1568 (State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold, 2013-Ohio-1568.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99626
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., BRIAN MCMICHAEL RELATOR
vs. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD, JUDGE
RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 463445 Order No. 463660
RELEASE DATE: April 15, 2013 FOR RELATOR
Brian McMichael Inmate No. 632-186 Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, Ohio 43301
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: James E. Moss Assistant Prosecuting Attorney The Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 LARRY A. JONES, SR., P.J.:
{¶1} Brian McMichael has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. McMichael
seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Shirley Strickland-Saffold to issue a
ruling with regard to a motion for jail-time credit that was filed in State v. McMichael,
Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-555981. In addition, McMichael seeks findings of fact and
conclusions of law with regard to his motion for jail-time credit. We decline to issue a
writ of mandamus on behalf of McMichael.
{¶2} Attached to Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a
journal entry journalized on March 14, 2013, which demonstrates that a ruling has been
rendered with regard to McMichael’s motion for jail-time credit. The request for a writ
of mandamus is moot. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio
St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d
5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983). In addition, Judge Saffold possesses no clear duty to render
findings of fact and conclusions of law with regard to ruling on McMichael’s motion for
jail-time credit. State ex rel. Haines v. Sutula, 8th Dist. No. 96429, 2011-Ohio-1968;
State ex rel. Jefferson v. Russo, 8th Dist. No. 90682, 2008-Ohio-135.
{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment.
Costs to McMichael. The courts directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice
of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶4} Writ denied. LARRY A. JONES, SR., PRESIDING JUDGE
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J., and PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 1568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcmichael-v-saffold-ohioctapp-2013.