State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold

2013 Ohio 1568
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 15, 2013
Docket99626
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2013 Ohio 1568 (State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold, 2013 Ohio 1568 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. McMichael v. Saffold, 2013-Ohio-1568.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99626

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., BRIAN MCMICHAEL RELATOR

vs. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD, JUDGE

RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 463445 Order No. 463660

RELEASE DATE: April 15, 2013 FOR RELATOR

Brian McMichael Inmate No. 632-186 Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, Ohio 43301

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

BY: James E. Moss Assistant Prosecuting Attorney The Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 LARRY A. JONES, SR., P.J.:

{¶1} Brian McMichael has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. McMichael

seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Shirley Strickland-Saffold to issue a

ruling with regard to a motion for jail-time credit that was filed in State v. McMichael,

Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-555981. In addition, McMichael seeks findings of fact and

conclusions of law with regard to his motion for jail-time credit. We decline to issue a

writ of mandamus on behalf of McMichael.

{¶2} Attached to Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a

journal entry journalized on March 14, 2013, which demonstrates that a ruling has been

rendered with regard to McMichael’s motion for jail-time credit. The request for a writ

of mandamus is moot. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio

St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d

5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983). In addition, Judge Saffold possesses no clear duty to render

findings of fact and conclusions of law with regard to ruling on McMichael’s motion for

jail-time credit. State ex rel. Haines v. Sutula, 8th Dist. No. 96429, 2011-Ohio-1968;

State ex rel. Jefferson v. Russo, 8th Dist. No. 90682, 2008-Ohio-135.

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment.

Costs to McMichael. The courts directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice

of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied. LARRY A. JONES, SR., PRESIDING JUDGE

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J., and PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Tobias v. Fuerst
2022 Ohio 3556 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 Ohio 1568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcmichael-v-saffold-ohioctapp-2013.