State ex rel. McLeod v. Logan

100 So. 173, 87 Fla. 348
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 5, 1924·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Ellis, J.

The writ 'of Habeas Corpus is a writ the function of which is to cause the body of a person who is, [349]*349oi* claims to be, unlawfully deprived of his liberty to be brought before the court that it may inquire into the cause of his detention and if found to be illegal that he may be restored to liberty.

The plaintiff in error in this case was not at the time he applied for the writ deprived of his liberty, nor is he now deprived of his liberty, but is under an appearance bond to answer a criminal charge duly lodged against him.

Habeas Corpus is not a proceeding which can be utilized in place of a writ of error or an appeal; nor does it perform the functions of either.

The order of the Court denying the petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus is affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Browne, J’., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. McLeod v. Logan, 100 So. 173, 87 Fla. 348 (Fla. 1924).

100 So. 173 (State ex rel. McLeod v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

India Comer and Shantearia Gaines v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
To v. ALACHUA JUVENILE DETENTION CTR.
668 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Jenkins v. Wainwright
322 So. 2d 477 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Sneed v. Mayo
66 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Jones v. Cook
200 So. 856 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
State Ex Rel. O'Berry v. Pearson
186 So. 430 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Roberts v. State of Florida
116 So. 228 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Roberts v. State
95 Fla. 182 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)