State ex rel. McKenzie v. State

750 So. 2d 973, 1999 La. LEXIS 3124, 1999 WL 1038330
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 5, 1999·No. No. 99-KH-1657·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re McKenzie, James; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial [974]*974Writ, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 80CRC35488.

Writ granted in part. This district court judge who denied relator’s application for post-conviction relief filed the state’s appellate brief in relator’s appeal in this Court almost twenty years ago. Accordingly, the judge should have recused himself from post-conviction relief proceedings. La.C.Cr.P. art. 671(A)(3); State ex rel. Truvia v. State, 96-1278 (La.2/6/98), 709 So.2d 723; State ex rel. Bright v. State, 96-2537 (La.10/31/97), 701 So.2d 1322. Therefore, the ruling on relator’s application for post-conviction relief is vacated and the case remanded to the district court for reassignment to another judge to rule on relator’s application.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. McKenzie v. State, 750 So. 2d 973, 1999 La. LEXIS 3124, 1999 WL 1038330 (La. 1999).

750 So. 2d 973 (State ex rel. McKenzie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Connolly
930 So. 2d 951 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2006)