State ex rel. McKenzie v. Imperial Adhesives, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. McKenzie v. Imperial Adhesives, Inc.

2002 Ohio 2225, 95 Ohio St. 3d 327

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 22, 2002

Docket2001-1651

StatusPublished

This text of 2002 Ohio 2225 (State ex rel. McKenzie v. Imperial Adhesives, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. McKenzie v. Imperial Adhesives, Inc., 2002 Ohio 2225, 95 Ohio St. 3d 327 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 327.]

THE STATE EX REL. MCKENZIE, APPELLANT, v. IMPERIAL ADHESIVES, INC. ET AL.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

[Cite as State ex rel. McKenzie v. Imperial Adhesives, Inc., 2002-Ohio-2225.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2001-1651—Submitted April 9, 2002—Decided May 22, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1402. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and Lisa M. Clark, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 327.]

THE STATE EX REL. MCKENZIE, APPELLANT, v. IMPERIAL ADHESIVES, INC. ET AL.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

[Cite as State ex rel. McKenzie v. Imperial Adhesives, Inc., 2002-Ohio-2225.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2001-1651—Submitted April 9, 2002—Decided May 22, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1402. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and Lisa M. Clark, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 2225, 95 Ohio St. 3d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mckenzie-v-imperial-adhesives-inc-ohio-2002.