Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. McIntosh v. Kubicki

State ex rel. McIntosh v. Kubicki

940 N.E.2d 984, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1529
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 2011
Docket2010-1996
StatusPublished

This text of 940 N.E.2d 984 (State ex rel. McIntosh v. Kubicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. McIntosh v. Kubicki, 940 N.E.2d 984, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1529 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On complaint in mandamus of Thomas McIntosh. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.5 determination, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would grant a writ of mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 N.E.2d 984, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcintosh-v-kubicki-ohio-2011.