State Ex Rel. McGrath v. McDonnell, Unpublished Decision (2-6-2006)
This text of 2006 Ohio 535 (State Ex Rel. McGrath v. McDonnell, Unpublished Decision (2-6-2006)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of the findings of fact and conclusions of law issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on December 16, 2005. Relator has not opposed the motion. Respondent argues that relief in this action in mandamus is inappropriate because she has discharged her duty. We agree.
{¶ 3} Relator has also failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a) which requires that complaints in original actions be supported by an affidavit from the plaintiff or relator specifying the details of the claim. State ex rel. Hightower v.Russo, Cuyahoga App. No. 82321, 2003-Ohio-3679. The "Verification" attached to the complaint is not notarized. See R.C.
{¶ 4} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
Sweeney, P.J., concurs. Calabrese, Jr., J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2006 Ohio 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcgrath-v-mcdonnell-unpublished-decision-2-6-2006-ohioctapp-2006.